Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 45025 (PAT)

Md. Tajuddin @ Teju Nadaf v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./88981/2025 · 2026-01-17

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88981 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-103 Year-2023 Thana- HAYAGHAT District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Md. Tajuddin @ Teju Nadaf S/o Late- Jabbar Nadaf R/o Village- Nayatola Hayaghat Bilashpur, P.S- Hayaghat, Dist- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashi Kant , Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Veena Kumari Jaiswal , APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 17-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State . 2. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 308, 354, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code . 3 . The prosecution case , in brief, is that informant namely , Raksana Khatun alleged that this petitioner along with co-accused assaulted informant and her family with lathi and danda . It is further alleged that accused persons also disrobed Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88981 of 2025(2) dt.17-01-2026 2/3 daughter of informant. 4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that on account of a family feud, all the family members entered into a scuffle resulting into some unfortunate injury . The alleged incidence took place on 19.06.2023 and the fardbeyan was recorded on 07.07.2023 in the City Hospital and later on , FIR was lodged on 18.07.2023 after the delay of about more than 15 days for which there is no plausible explanation . Allegation is general and omnibus against this petitioner. No specific allegation of overt act is alleged against him. Petitioner claims clean antecedent. Similarly situated co-accused persons have already been granted bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court vide order dated 15.01.2026 in Cr. Misc. No. 91177 of 2025 . 5 . Learned counsel for the State opposed the bail petition . 6 Considering the aforesaid facts, clean antecedent of the petitioner and other circumstances of the case , in the event of arrest or surrender within eight weeks from today, let the petitioner, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM – VI, Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88981 of 2025(2) dt.17-01-2026 3/3 Darbhanga in connection with Hayghat P.S. Case No. 103 of 2023 , subject to the conditions laid down under section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 . Koushik/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T