TENNETI MARIYAMMA v. VELIDI VEERA VENKATA MOHAN CHALAPATI
CRP/200/2023 · 2026-07-02
Subba Reddy Satti
Original Suitbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4502 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4502 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Date of reserved for orders : -- Date of pronouncement : 03.07.2026 Date of uploading
:
APHC010046072023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 200/2023 Between:
1. TENNETI MARIYAMMA, W/O. LATE KORNELU, AGE. 57 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO.8-15, TENNETI NAGAR, RAJOLU, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. VELIDI VEERA VENKATA MOHAN CHALAPATI, S/o. Venkata Thammarao, Age. 59 years, Occ. Business, R/o. H.No.4-114, 1st Floor, Old Andhra Bank Street, Rajolu.
...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to petitioner begs to present this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition against the order dt.24.01.2023 in IA No.9 of 2016 in OS No.16 of 2014 on the file of the Court of the II Additional District Judge, Amalapuram. following among other.
IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay all further proceedings in O.S.No.16 of 2014 on the file of the Court
of the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Amalapuram pending disposal of the above CRP and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VEMA RAMANJANEYULU Counsel for the Respondent:
1. T V S PRABHAKARA RAO The Court made the following:
::ORDER ::
Sri D. Sairam Prasad, learned counsel representing Sri Vema Ramanjaneyulu, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the cause in the civil revision petition does not survive for adjudication and the civil revision petition has become infructuous.
2. Sri T.V.S. Prabhakara Rao, learned counsel appearing for the respondent endorses the same.
3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 03.07.2026 TVN
Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No
16 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 200 of 2023
Date: 03.07.2026 TVN