Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 45010 (KAR)

SRI SHIVASWMAY v. SRI VENKATESHA T

CCC/1538/2025 · 2026-09-29

D K Singh, H Shanthi Bhushan

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010843892025 NC: 2026:KHC:54322-DB WA No. 2098 of 2025 C/W CCC No. 1538 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN WRIT APPEAL NO. 2098 OF 2025 (S-KSRTC) C/W CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1538 OF 2025 IN WA No. 2098/2025 BETWEEN: 1. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER KSRTC, MYSORE RURAL DIVISION BANNIMANTAP EXTENSION MYSURU 570015 NOW REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER 2. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER KSRTC, MANDYA DIVISION MAIN BUS STAND MANDYA NOW REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. RENUKA H.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SHIVASWAMY S/O LATE CHIKKALILNGAPPA Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010843892025 NC: 2026:KHC:54322-DB WA No. 2098 of 2025 C/W CCC No. 1538 of 2025 AGE ABOUT 68 YEARS R/A NEW KOPPA CIRCLE B M ROAD, SHIVAPURA MADDUR TOWN MANDYA DISTRICT 571429 …RESPONDENT (RESPONDENT SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 16/07/2025 PASSED IN WP NO.3040/2020. IN CCC NO. 1538/2025 BETWEEN: 1. SRI SHIVASWMAY S/O LATE CHIKKALINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, RETIRED TRAFFIC CONTROLLER, TOKEN NO. 2142, K.S.R.T.C., MANDYA DIVISION, R/AT NEW KOPPA CIRCLE, B.M. ROAD, SHIVAPURA, MADDUR TOWN, MANDYA DISTRICT-571 428. ...COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. SOMA SUNDER RAO R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI VENKATESHA T CHIEF LAW OFFICER, KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, CENTRAL OFFICES, K.H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560-027. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010843892025 NC: 2026:KHC:54322-DB WA No. 2098 of 2025 C/W CCC No. 1538 of 2025 2. SRI J ANTHONY GEORGE CHIEF TRAFFIC MANAGER, KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, CENTRAL OFFICES, K.H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560027 3. SRI CHARANA BASVA RAJU DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, MYSURU RURAL DIVISION, BANNIMANTAP EXTENSION, MYSURU-570 015. 4. SRI DASARTH DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, MANDYA DIVISION,, MAIN BUS STAND, MANDYA-571 004. ...ACCUSED (BY SRI. RENUKA H.R., ADVOCATE FOR A1 - A4) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER A SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT, 1971 BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN PRAYS THAT THE HON'BLE COURT BE PLEASED TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED BOARD FOR HAVING DELIBERATELY DISOBEYED ORDER DATED 16.07.2025 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P.NO.3040/2020 (S-KSRTC) VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND PASS SUCH OTHER ORDER OR ORDERS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO PASS IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010843892025 NC: 2026:KHC:54322-DB WA No. 2098 of 2025 C/W CCC No. 1538 of 2025 THIS APPEAL ALONG WITH CCC, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) Despite service of notice, the respondent has chosen not to appear either in person or through counsel, and he is therefore set ex parte. 2. Heard Smt. Renuka H.R., learned counsel for the appellant-Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation. 3. The present intra-court appeal has been filed impugning the judgment and order dated 16.07.2025 passed by the Writ Court in W.P. No.3040/2020, which was filed by the respondent. 4. The respondent was appointed as a conductor. He sought a voluntary transfer on 01.09.2001 from the Mysuru Urban Division to the Mysuru Rural Division of the appellant- corporation. This request of the respondent was acceded to, - 5 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010843892025 NC: 2026:KHC:54322-DB WA No. 2098 of 2025 C/W CCC No. 1538 of 2025 and he was transferred to the Mysuru Rural Division. Subsequently, the respondent made a representation on 04.12.2018 seeking to restore his seniority on par with one Mahadeva, who was also a conductor. 5. According to the respondent, Mahadeva was transferred under similar circumstances but was granted seniority as per his position in the original seniority list and in accordance with his date of appointment. 6. The said representation dated 04.12.2018 was rejected vide an order dated 13.02.2019 passed by the corporation, on the ground that an employee of the corporation seeking a voluntary transfer would not be entitled to their original seniority as per Regulation 13(4)(iii) of the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation Cadre and Recruitment Regulations, 1982. 7. This order of the corporation was challenged by the respondent in W.P.No.3040/2020. The Writ Court, vide the impugned order, allowed the writ petition in part, quashed the endorsement dated 18.02.2019, and directed the appellant- - 6 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010843892025 NC: 2026:KHC:54322-DB WA No. 2098 of 2025 C/W CCC No. 1538 of 2025 corporation to grant all benefits, including seniority, to the respondent by treating his transfer as transfer on administrative grounds. 8. Smt. Renuka H.R., learned counsel for the appellant-corporation, has made two primary submissions: i. The respondent was transferred way back on 01.09.2001, yet he claimed seniority for the first time vide a representation dated 04.12.2018. Therefore, such a belated claim ought not to have been considered, and the writ petition should not have been entertained. ii. She further submits that, even otherwise, the respondent is not entitled to his original seniority as per Regulation 13(4)(iii) of the Cadre and Recruitment Regulations employees transferred to another division on request are entitled to seniority in the post held by them on such transfer only from the date on which they report to the division to which they are transferred. Therefore, the respondent was not entitled to retain his original seniority, but he is only entitled to seniority in the Mysuru Rural Division from the date he assumed charge. - 7 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010843892025 NC: 2026:KHC:54322-DB WA No. 2098 of 2025 C/W CCC No. 1538 of 2025 9. We have considered the submissions of Smt. Renuka H.R., learned counsel for the appellant-corporation. 10. When the regulation itself provides that upon voluntary transfer, an employee is entitled to seniority from the date they assume charge in that division and not their original position, the rule must prevail. It is not in dispute that the respondent was transferred on his own request. Therefore, he would be entitled to seniority only from the date he assumed charge in the Mysuru Rural Division in accordance with the provisions of the KSRTC Cadre and Recruitment Regulations. The said regulation reads as under: "Normally the employees holding division wise post will be considered for promotion under these regulations in respect of promotional vacancies in the divisionwise post in their respective divisions only. In respect of the employees who are transferred from one division to another on administrative grounds the entire service rendered by them in the division from which they are transferred shall count for seniority in the division to which they are transferred. Such transfers shall be restored to sparingly. The employees who are transferred to another division on request shall take seniority in the post held by them - 8 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010843892025 NC: 2026:KHC:54322-DB WA No. 2098 of 2025 C/W CCC No. 1538 of 2025 on such transfer from the date on which they report in the division to which they are transferred." 11. When the respondent never challenged his seniority after 01.09.2001 and only made a representation after 17 long years, the said delayed claim of seniority could not have been entertained. We are, therefore, of the view that the impugned order passed by the Writ Court is unsustainable. Consequently, we allow this appeal and set aside the impugned order passed by the Writ Court. 12. In view of the order passed today in this Writ Appeal, the connected contempt petition No.1538/2025 does not survive and is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN) JUDGE RKA CT:SN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 5