Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4501 (RAJ)

POOJA MEENA D/O SHRI KAMLESH MEEDNA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/441/2026 · 2026-03-24

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:12452] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 441/2026 1. Pooja Meena D/o Shri Kamlesh Meedna, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Meena Mohalla, Nar School Bageena, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) At Present R/o Village And Post Ranwal, Tehsil And District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) 2. Deepak Meena Son of Shri Rajendra Prasad Meena, Aged About 29 Years, Resident of Village And Post Ranwal, Tehsil And District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Secretary, Department of Home Affairs And Justice, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Superintendent of Police, Sawai Madhopur, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) 3. Station House Officer, Police Station Chauth Ka Barwara, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) 4. Nodal Officer, Police Station Chauth Ka Barwara, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) 5. Kamlesh Meena Son Of Nanakram, Resident Of Meena Mohalla, Near School Bageena, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) 6. Brijmohan Meena S/o Nanakram, R/o Meena Mohalla, Near School Bageena, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) 7. Hariram Meena S/o Nanakram, R/o Meena Mohalla, Near School Bageena, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) 8. Shivshankar Mena S/o Brijmohan Meena, R/o Meena Mo- halla, Near School Bageena, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) 9. Surendra Meena S/o Brijmohan Meena, R/o Meena Mo- halla, Near School Bageena, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) 10. Ramhet Meena S/p Hariram Meedna, R/o Meena Mohalla, Near School Bageena, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) 11. Mastram Meena S/o Hariram Meena, R/o Meena Mohalla, Near School Bageena, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) 12. Shukhram Meedna S/o Hariram Meena, R/o Meena Mo- [2026:RJ-JP:12452] (2 of 3) [CRLW-441/2026] halla, Near School Bageena, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) 13. Buddhiprakash Meena S/o Hariram Meena, R/o Meena Mohalla, Near School Bageena, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kuldeep Singh for Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 24/03/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the registry are overruled. 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.5 to 13 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Arya Samaj Sansthan, 201-202, Second Floor Apex Towar, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur on 05.03.2026 and same has been registered before the Office of Marriage Registration Officer, Nagar Nigam Jaipur. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this [2026:RJ-JP:12452] (3 of 3) [CRLW-441/2026] petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.5 to 13 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.3-Station House Officer, Police Station Chauth Ka Barwara, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) and respondent No.3 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /357