Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 45009 (MAD)

T. Venkatachalam v. The District Collector

WP/24275/2026 · 2026-06-25

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 24275 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 24275 of 2026 1. T. Venkatachalam, S/o. Muthu Gounder, D.No.3/205 Nonakatti Kottai, Bandarahalli Village, Karimangalam Taluk, Dharmapuri District -635 123. 2. A. Sivalingam, S/o. Annamalai, D.No.3/199 Nonakatti Kottai, Bandarahalli Village, Karimangalam Taluk, Dharmapuri District -635 123. 3. C. Karthik, S/o. Chinnasamy, D.No.3/490 Nonakatti Kottai, Bandarahalli Village, Karimangalam Taluk, Dharmapuri District -635 123. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector, O/o. The District Collector, Dharmapuri Dharmapuri District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dharmapuri Revenue Division, Gandhi Nagar, Dharmapuri District. 3. The Tahsildhar Karimangalam Taluk, Dharmapuri District. 4. The Superintendent of Police District Police Office, Dharmapuri 636 705. ..Respondent(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 24275 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 6 PRAYER:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents Nos.1 to 3 to survey demarcate the boundaries with respect to the “Poosthithi Paathai”, pathway situated in Survey Nos. 484/3C and 479/1B of Bandarahalli Village, Karimangalam Taluk, Dharmapuri District and to remover the encroachments made if any by the private individuals in accordance with law on the said pathway with the necessary police production within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.L.Sathiyaraj For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachiayappan, Government’s Counsel for R1 to R3 Mr.Durai Gunasekaran, Government Advocate (Crl.side) for R4 Order This writ petition has been filed seeking to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to survey demarcate the boundaries with respect to the “Poosthithi Paathai”, pathway situated in Survey Nos. 484/3C and 479/1B of Bandarahalli Village, Karimangalam Taluk, Dharmapuri District. 2.Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners’ made a representation dated 02.11.2025 seeking to survey and demarcate the boundaries with respect to the “Poosthithi Paathai”, pathway situated in Survey Nos. 484/3C and 479/1B of Bandarahalli Village, Karimangalam Taluk, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 24275 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 6 Dharmapuri District. Since the same was not considered the respondents, the present writ petition has been filed. 3.Mr.B.Pachiayappan, Government’s Counsel accepts notice on behalf of R1 to R3 and Mr. Durai Gunasekaran, Government Advocate (Crl.side), accepts notice on behalf of R4. 4.Learned Government’s Counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 would submit that the petitioners’ representation dated 02.11.2025 will be considered and disposed of within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 5.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners; the learned Government’s Counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the 4th respondent. 6.Considering the submissions made by both parties and in view of the limited prayer sought for in this writ petition, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 02.11.2025 and conduct a survey and demarcate the subject properties, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after issuing prior notice to the petitioners and other parties concerned, if any. If any need arises for Police assistance, it is https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 24275 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 6 open to the 3rd respondent to request for Police protection from the 4th respondent/jurisdictional Police. If any such request is made, the 4th respondent /jurisdictional Police is directed to provide an adequate Police protection for conducting the survey. It is made clear that this order is passed solely for the purpose of directing 3rd respondent to conduct a survey and demarcate the subject property. If any dispute arises regarding the possession of the property, it must be resolved by filing a suit before a competent Civil Court. In the event of a title dispute, official respondents shall not take possession of the property and hand it over to any party. It is up to the parties concerned to seek recovery of possession through the due process of law. 7.With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 8. Post the matter under the caption “For Reporting Compliance” on 30.07.2026. 25-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RST https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 24275 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 6 To 1. The District Collector, O/o. The District Collector, Dharmapuri Dharmapuri District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dharmapuri Revenue Division, Gandhi Nagar, Dharmapuri District. 3. The Tahsildhar, Karimangalam Taluk, Dharmapuri District. 4. The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Dharmapuri 636 705. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 24275 of 2026 __________ Page6 of 6 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. RST WP No. 24275 of 2026 25-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis