Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 45003 (PAT)

Vikki Kumar @ Saurabh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./90797/2025 · 2026-01-16

Harish Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90797 of 2025 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66652 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-427 Year-2025 Thana- ALAMGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== 1. Vikki Kumar @ Saurabh Kumar S/o Shankar Tatwa Resident of Opposite Singhwa Tola, P.S- Belwarganj, Distt.- Patna 2. Vikas Kumar S/o Shankar Tatwa Resident of Opposite Singhwa Tola, P.S- Belwarganj, Distt.- Patna 3. Vijay Shankar @ Shankar Tatwa S/o Devi Lal Resident of Opposite Singhwa Tola, P.S- Belwarganj, Distt.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanat Kumar Mishra, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 16-01-2026 Learned Advocate for the respective parties are present. 2. The present application has been filed seeking modification of the order dated 17.09.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No.66652 of 2025, whereby while extending the privilege of anticipatory bail, one of the conditions was “One of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioners”. 3. Learned Advocate for the petitioners submitted that most of the family members have been made accused in the present case and some of them are residing outside the State and, as such, on account of the aforesaid reason, the afore-noted Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90797 of 2025(2) dt.16-01-2026 2/2 condition as imposed by this Court, could not be fulfilled. 3. In view of the submissions advanced by the learned Advocate for the petitioner and taking note of the averments made in the modification application, the same stands allowed. 4. The condition to the extent that “One of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioners” shall be read as “One of the bailors shall be the local residents of the petitioners”. 5. The period for furnishing bail bond is extended for a further period of four weeks from today. 6. The order dated 17.09.2025 stands modified to the extent indicated above. rohit/- (Harish Kumar, J) U T