Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4500 (JHR)

KANHAIYA KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY DEPARTMENT

WPC/4573/2024 · 2026-03-19

Sri Ananda Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:7817 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 4573 of 2024 ------ 1. Kanhaiya Kumar aged about 39 years, Son of: Vinay Prasad, Resident of Village- Mandro, Karribank P.O.- Mandro, PS:- Gandey, District- Giridih (Jharkhand)-815312. 2. Awadesh Kumar Singh aged about 42 years, Son of Govind Singh, Resident of Village-P.O. +P.S. Katkamsandi, District- Hazaribagh (Jharkhand)- 525319. 3. Amit Kumar Sinha aged about 40 years, Son of : Sunil Kumar Sinha, resident of Village- Mandro, P.O. Mandro, PS- Gandey, District- Giridih (Jharkhand) 815312. 4. Mahendra Prasad aged about 43 years, Son of Sahdev Mahto, Resident of Village- Berho, P.O. + P.S. Tatijhariya District- Hazaribagh (Jharkhand)- 825313. 5. Devendra Prasad aged about 45 years, Son of : Loki Mahto, resident of Village- Barsot, P.O. Nagar Barsot, PS: Barhi, District- Hazaribagh (Jharkhand)-825405. 6. Siyaram Prasad Roy aged about 45 years, Son of: Bhola Nath Ray, Resident of Village- Barakola, P.O.: Lakhoriya, P.S. Sarwan, District- Deoghar (Jharkhand)-814150. 7. Surendra Prasad Yadav aged about 46 years, Son of : Mahadeo Prasad Yadav, resident of Purani Chihutiya, Margomunda, P.O.: Mahupr, PS: Margomunda, District- Deoghar (Jharkhand)-815353. 8. Shiv Kumar aged about 47 years, Son of : Late Tulsi Mahto, Resident of:- At Dulmi, P.O.: Harhad Kander PS: Rajrappa District- Ramgarh (Jharkhand)- 825101. 9. Uday Prasad Choudhary aged about 50 years, Son of Shakti Choudhary, Resident of Village-Merkhogundi, P.O.:- Phulchi, PS: Taratand, District- Giridih (Jharkhand)-815312. 10. Tapeshwar Ram aged about 44 years, Son of : Jhanku Ram, Resident of Village Gopda, P.O. & PS: Manatu, District- Hazaribagh (Jharkhand)- 825321. 11. Baijnath Mahto aged about 46 years, Son of Ganesh Mahto, Resident of Village- Baraikhurd, P.O. Chandipur, PS: Kasmar, Petarbar, District- Bokaro (829121). 12. Binod Prasad Mehta aged about 42 years, Son of: Jagdish Ram, resident of: Village Barkakhurd, Ratanpur P.O.: Ratanpur, PS:Ichak, District- Hazaribagh (Jharkhand)-825402. 13. Manoj Kumar aged about 46 years, Son of: Bhola Mistry, Resident of Village- Barka Kanla, P.O.:-Ratanpur, PS: Ichak, District- Hazaribagh (Jharkhand)- 825402. … … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S.: Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi 2026:JHHC:7817 (Jharkhand)-834004. 2. The Director, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S.: Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand)-834004. 3. The Deputy Commissioner, Giridih, PO, PS & Dist:- Giridih. 4. The District Superintendent of Education, Giridih PO & PS & Dist: Giridih. 5. The Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh, PO, PS & District- Hazaribagh. 6. The District Superintendent of Education, Hazaribagh PO, PS & Dist: Hazaribagh. 7. The Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar, PO, PS & Dist:-Deoghar. 8. The District Superintendent of Education, Deoghar PO, PS & Dist.: Deoghar. 9. The Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh, PO, PS & Dist.: Ramgarh. 10. The District Superintendent of Education, Ramgarh PO, PS & Dist.: Ramgarh. 11. The Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro, PO, PS & Dist: Bokaro. 12. The District Superintendent of Education, Bokaro PO, PS & Dist:Bokaro. 13. The Deputy Commissioner, Koderma, PO, PS & Dist.: Koderma. 14. The District Superintendent of Education, Koderma PO, PS & Dist.: Koderma. 15. The Deputy Commissioner, Sahibganj, PO, PS & Dist.: Sahibganj. 16. The District Superintendent of Education, Sahibganj PO, PS & Dist.: Sahibganj. … … Respondent(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ranjan Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : Ms. Sweta Shukla, A.C. to A.G.A.-III. ------ 06/ 19th March, 2026 1. Counsel for the petitioners submits that this writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 19.03.2026 Amar/-