1 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.685 of 2026 Dated 29.06.2026 Date of reserved for orders : Nil Date of pronouncement : 29.06.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010324442026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY, THE 29th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 685/2026 Between: 1. UNNAM SEETHAMMA, , W/O.NARASIMHA RAO,AGED 74 YEARS,R/O. MUNAGALAPALLI VILLAGE,CHANDARLAPADU MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT. 2. UNNAM NARASIMHA RAO, , S/O. GURAVAIAH,AGED 76 YEARS,R/O. MUNAGALAPALLI VILLAGE,CHANDARLAPADU MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT. 3. UNNAM GIRI BABU, , S/O. NARASIMHA RAO,AGED 45 YEARS,R/O. MUNAGALAPALLI VILLAGE,CHANDARLAPADU MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT. 4. RAVURI PARVATHI, , W/O. SESHAGIRI RAO,AGED 44 YEARS,R/O. MUNAGALAPALLI VILLAGE,CHANDARLAPADU MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, .Rep. by Sub-Inspector of Police,Chandarlapadu P.S.NTR DistrictRep. by its Public ProsecutorHigh Court of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT 2 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.685 of 2026 Dated 29.06.2026 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): NIRMALBABU A Counsel for the Respondent: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: The present Criminal Revision Case is filed challenging the order dated 04.12.2025 passed in Crl.M.P.No.2328 of 2024 in C.C.No.633 of 2017 on the file of the learned Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nandigama, whereby the petition filed under Section 211 of ‘the Cr.P.C.,’ to return the unmarked documents to the petitioners, was dismissed. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record. 3. The impugned order dated 04.12.2025 passed in Crl.M.P.No.2328 of 2024 in C.C.No.633 of 2017 on the file of the learned Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nandigama, is purely interlocutory in nature. In view of the bar contained under Section 397(2) of ‘the Cr.P.C.,’/Section 438(2) of ‘the BNSS’, and in view of the judgments of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Sethuraman v. Rajamanickam1, Bhaskar 1(2009) 5 SCC 153 3 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.685 of 2026 Dated 29.06.2026 Industries Ltd. v. Bhiwani Denim & Apparels Ltd.2, Girish Kumar Suneja v. CBI3 and Amar Nath v. State of Haryana4, the present Criminal Revision Case is not maintainable. 4. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is liable to be dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to file an appropriate application, in accordance with law. 5. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dated: 29.06.2026 RSI Whether the order is: Speaking Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable 2(2001) 7 SCC 401 3(2017) 14 SCC 809 4(1977) 4 SCC 137 4 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.685 of 2026 Dated 29.06.2026 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 685 of 2026 Dated: 29.06.2026 RSI 163 5 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.685 of 2026 Dated 29.06.2026