Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 450 (JHR)

RANJIT RAWANI v. THE JHARKHAND URJA VIKAS NIGAM LIMITED THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR

WPC/3120/2018 · 2026-03-25

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:8535 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 3120 of 2018 --------- Ranjit Rawani, aged about 30 years, S/o Narayan Rawani, R/o House No. 195, Bholanath Baseriya Basti, P.O. & P.S. Kusunda, Dist. Dhanbad. ......Petitioner Versus 1. The Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited through its Chairman-Cum-Managing Director, Officer at Engineers Building, H.E.C. Township, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, Dist. Ranchi. 2. Deputy General Manager (HR), Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. Engineers Building, H.E.C. Township, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, Dist. Ranchi. 3. Electrical Executive, Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd., Engineers Building, H.E.C. Township, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, Dist. Ranchi. 4. Southern Railways, through its General Manager, Headquarters Office at Park Town, P.O. & P.S. Park Town, Dist. Chennai. 5. Senior Divisional Electrical Engineer (Rolling Stock) (BG) Branch, Southern Railways, Avadi, P.O. & P.S. Avadi, Dist. Chennai. .....Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Burman, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Brij Bihari Sinha, S.C. (JUVNL) --------- 16/Dated:-25.03.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to want of instruction, he is unable to press this writ application. 2. There is no objection from the respondents. 3. Having regard to the aforesaid submission and looking to the prayer made in this writ application, it appears that the same has now become infructuous. 4. In any view of the matter, the instant writ application stands dismissed as not pressed. Pending I.A., if any, also stands closed. (Deepak Roshan, J.) MARCH 25, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 01.04.2026