HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 9121 of 2026 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent-authority is not issuing character certificate to the petitioner despite the fact that petitioner has submitted representations to the respondent-authority for issuance of the same, but till date, no action has been taken on the same. 3. Learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent No.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all his grievances before the respondent No.2-District Magistrate, District Muzaffar Nagar within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent No.2 shall consider and decide the same in light of the guidelines laid down by this Court in bunch of writ petitions leading of which is Writ-C No.718 of 2025 (Anil Kumar Vs. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. & Others) within a period of one month thereafter from the date he receives the representation. March 18, 2026 Gaurav Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pradumn Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Ram Narayan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad