CRP No. 3589 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-07-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE CRP No. 3589 of 2026 AND CMP NO. 15624 OF 2026 1. Muthusamy Gounder (Died) 1.Aruchamy Gounder 2. Apachi Gounder 3. Kittuchamy Gounder 4. Valliammal 5. M.Murugesan Petitioner(s) Vs Arulmigu Senraya Perumal Temple Rep by its fit person, Senrampalayam Hamlet, Devarayapuram Village, Kinathukadavu Taluk, Coimbatore District Respondent(s) PRAYER To set aside the fair and final order dated 05.06.2026 made in IA.No.09 of 2026 in OS.No.80 of 2015 on the file of the Ld V Additional District Judge, Coimbatore. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Siddarth Sridhar ORDER This Civil Revision Petition has been filed, challenging the impugned order dated 05.06.2026 passed by the V Additional District Judge, Coimbatore in I.A. No.09 of 2026 in O.S. No.80 of 2015. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 3589 of 2026 2.Under the aforesaid order, the application filed by the petitioners, who are the defendants in the suit seeking to re-open the defendants’ side evidence for examination of witnesses has been allowed by imposing a cost of Rs.15,000/-. The petitioners are aggrieved only by the imposition of cost in this petition. 3.Admittedly, the application has been filed only to re-open the defendants’ side evidence, which was closed earlier for the fault of the petitioners/defendants. The Trial Court has ordered cost of only Rs.15,000/- for allowing I.A., which cannot be construed to be excessive as claimed by the petitioners. Admittedly, the suit schedule property measures an extent of more than 5 acres. The suit has been filed for declaration of title and for recovery of possession by the respondent/plaintiff against the petitioners. 4.For the foregoing reasons, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the imposition of cost by the Trial Court under the impugned order. Therefore, there is no merit in this petition. 5.However, after this Court passed the aforesaid order, the learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, would now submit that the petitioners are willing to examine the witnesses on their behalf pursuant to the impugned order and are also willing to pay the cost of Rs.15,000/- to the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 3589 of 2026 respondent within a period of two days from today. The petitioners, on payment of the cost imposed under the impugned order within the stipulated time fixed by this Court, are allowed to examine the witnesses on their behalf in the suit. The V Additional District Judge, Coimbatore shall act accordingly. 6.Since no adverse orders are passed against the respondent, notice to the respondent is dispensed with. 7.With the above observation, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected CMP is closed. No costs. 03-07-2026 vga To 1.The V Additional District Judge, Coimbatore. 2.The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 3589 of 2026 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. vga CRP No. 3589 of 2026 AND CMP NO. 15624 OF 2026 03-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis