Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44989 (KAR)

MR MANUEL PERIERA v. CHIEF MANAGER

WP/2984/2024 · 2026-10-07

K S Hemalekha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010062652024 NC: 2026:KHC:55901 WP No. 2984 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO.2984 OF 2024 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. MR MANUEL PERIERA S/O MATHEW PERIERA AGED 58 YEARS, 103, FIRST FLOOR, PVR TOWER, CHINNAPPA LANE, ITI COLONY, COX TOWN, JEEVANAHALLI MAIN ROD, BANGALORE NORTH, FRAZER TOWN, BANGALORE URBAN - 560005. 2. RUPHINA PEREIRA W/O MANUEL PERIERA AGED 52 YEARS, 103, FIRST FLOOR, PVR TOWER CHINNAPPA LANE, ITI COLONY, COX TOWN, JEEVANAHALLI MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE NORTH, FRAZER TOWN, BANGALORE URBAN - 560 005. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. DEVI PRASAD SHETTY, ADVOCATE) AND: CHIEF MANAGER AUTHORIZED OFFICER SOUTH INDIA BANK LTD., SIB ARCADE NO.61, WHEELER ROAD, COX TOWN, BANGALORE - 560 005. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. NARAYANA SHENOY, ADVOCATE FOR C/R) Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010062652024 NC: 2026:KHC:55901 WP No. 2984 of 2024 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONERS DATED 10.01.2024 IN REF.NO: BLR:RO:REC:245:23-24 BY RESPONDENT NO.1 IS HEREWITH PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-B AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA ORAL ORDER 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not intend to press the present petition and seeks permission to withdraw the same. A memo to that effect has been filed. 2. Memo reads as under: “That the petitioners in the above petition submits that the petitioners does not want to press the above petition as the prayer sought by the petitioners has become infructuous. Hence the above petition may kindly be dismissed as withdrawn in the interest of justice and equity.” 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- ____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA AT List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4