33 30.09.2026 Ct. No.6 P.A./A,P IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction WPA No. 2350 of 2026 Kajal Saha & Anr. v/s The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Chinmoy Roy Mr. Sayan Saha …for the petitioners. Mr. Sourav Lohani Mr. Abhishek Singh …for the Respondent. Mr. Dipankar Sen Ms. Nitiksha Biswakarma …for the State. Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner is taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the private respondents tried to encroach upon the land of the petitioners, abused them in filthy language, vandalized their property and threatened them with dire consequences for which they approached the local police authority with a complaint which was not registered. They also approached the Superintendent of Police, Cooch Behar with a complaint on 10th September, 2026 which was also not considered. The petitioners seek 2 a direction upon police authority to take necessary steps pursuant to the complaints lodged by them. Learned counsel for the private respondents denies and disputes the allegations raised by the petitioners. Learned counsel for the State submits that civil disputes are pending between the parties. In view of the fact the petitioner alleges non- cooperation by the police authority in registering FIR pursuant to the complaint lodged by them, they are at liberty to approach the jurisdictional Magistrate under Section 175(3) of the BNSS for redressal of their grievance. Since nothing further remains to be dealt with the writ petition, the same is accordingly disposed of. There shall however be no order as costs. Since no affidavit is invited, the allegations contained in the petition are deemed not to have been admitted. Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Suvra Ghosh, J.)