IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89072 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-187 Year-2025 Thana- DINARA District- Rohtas ====================================================== Abhishek Chaudhary @ Sisha S/o Dudhnath Chaudhary R/o Village- Jigna, P.S- Dinara, Dist- Rohtash. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Vinod Shanker Modi, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 12-01-2026 Heard the parties. 2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with S. Tr. No. 377 of 2025 arising out of Dinara P.S. Case No. 187 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of BNS. 3. The main submissions advanced by petitioner’s counsel are that the FIR itself goes to show that the alleged incident of marpit was not intentional and the same is said to have occurred on account of scuffling having taken place in between the attendees of the marriage ceremony when they were dancing and in the FIR, nine persons including the petitioner have been made accused but any specific role of this petitioner in assaulting the informant’s minor son who later succumbed to his injuries has not been revealed. It is further submitted that petitioner bears no criminal antecedent and has been languishing in jail since Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89072 of 2025(2) dt.12-01-2026 2/2 14.05.2025 and he is a young person and against him, the investigation has been completed. 4. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that against the petitioner there is serious allegation and one person lost his life on account of the brutal marpit committed by the accused persons including this petitioner with the victim by means of lathi and danda. 5. Considering the genesis of the occurrence appearing from the FIR and the fact that the FIR has been registered against nine accused persons without specifying the specific role of the petitioner in the commission of the alleged marpirt coupled with the petitioner’s young age, fair and clean antecedent and his custody period and also completion of investigation against him, this Court is inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, let the petitioner named-above be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court in connection with S. Tr. No. 377 of 2025 arising out of Dinara P.S. Case No. 187 of 2025. maynaz/- (Shailendra Singh, J) U T