HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1357/2026 Bhuriya Kanjar @ Bablu S/o Jasotya, aged about 40 Years, R/o Bangmata, Ramnagar, Police Station Sadr, Bundi, District Bundi (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined at District Jail Bundi). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1358/2026 Kalu Kanjar S/o Jasotya, aged about 45 Years, R/o Bangmata, Ramnagar, Police Station Sadr, Bundi, District Bundi (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined At District Jail Bundi). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohd Umar Farooq Mr. Mohd. Asif For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore-PP Mr. Shivam JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 27/03/2026 1. Both bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. have been filed by the petitioners in connection with FIR No.508/2025 registered at the Police Station Sadar Bundi, District Bundi for offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 308(2) and 61(2) of BNS. (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1357/2026] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the alleged offences are triable by the Court of Judicial Magistrate. Counsel submits that after investigation, charge-sheet has been submitted and now the complainant has entered into a compromise with the petitioners and he does not wish to prosecute the petitioners. Counsel submits that the petitioners are in custody since the date of their arrest and trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioners. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail applications but counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant accepts the factum of compromise between the parties and submits that the complainant has no objection in case, indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioners. 4. Considering the arguments put forward by the learned counsel for the petitioners and looking to the fact that the alleged offences are triable by Court of Judicial Magistrate and after investigation, charge-sheet has been submitted and also looking to the fact that a compromise took place between the parties and the petitioners are in custody since the date of their arrest and since the trial will take its own time to conclude, hence without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioners under Section 483 B.N.S.S. 5. Accordingly, both the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners Bhuriya Kanjar @ Bablu S/o Jasotya and Kalu Kanjar S/o Jasotya arrested in connection with aforementioned FIR, may be (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1357/2026] released on bail; provided each of them furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned Trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/14-15