Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4496 (KAR)

MS KHUSHI SURYAKANT PATIL v. THE KARNATAKA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

WP/13614/2025 · 2026-04-02

Sachin Shankar Magadum

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18196 WP No. 13614 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 13614 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MS KHUSHI SURYAKANT PATIL D/O. SURYAKANT PATIL, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/AT HOUSE NO.201, MSR NAGAR, MATHIKERE, IMPERIAL NAVKIES CELESTE, BENGALURU-560 054. &PETITIONER (BY SRI. SATISH R GIRJI., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE KARNATAKA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION UDYOGA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, &RESPONDENT (BY SRI. K.M.PRAKASH, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO PERMIT THE PETITIONER TO APPEAR FOR THE MAIN EXAMINATION WHICH IS GOING TO BE HELD FROM 3RD MAY TO 9TH MAY 2025 AND ETC. Digitally signed by CHAITHRA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18196 WP No. 13614 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM ORAL ORDER The captioned writ petition is filed by the petitioner, a KPSC aspirant, calling in question the action of the respondents in denying her permission to appear for the KPSC Main Examination, notwithstanding the fact that she had successfully cleared the Preliminary Examination, solely on the ground that the prescribed fee was not remitted within the stipulated time. 2. During the pendency of the writ petition, this Court, by way of an interim order, permitted the petitioner to appear for the Main Examination, subject to further orders. 3. Sri. K.M. Prakash, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, on instructions, submits that the result of the petitioner would be declared and her candidature would be considered, subject to her eligibility to appear for the Personality Test. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18196 WP No. 13614 of 2025 4. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents, nothing further survives for consideration in the present writ petition. Recording the said submission, the respondents are directed to declare the result of the petitioner and, if she is found eligible, permit her to participate in the Personality Test. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39