Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4495 (CHH)

VRINDAVAN PATEL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2351/2026 · 2026-03-10

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:11665 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2351 of 2026 1 - Vrindavan Patel S/o Duryodhan Patel Aged About 38 Years Presently Posted As Trained Teacher (Correctional Service) Government Multi-Disabled Special School District- Mahasamund (C.G.) Pin Code - 493445 ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Department Of Social Welfare Mahanadi Bhawan Nava Raipur (C.G.) 492001 2 - Director Department Of Social Welfare Raipur C.G. Kutchery Chowk Raipur (C.G.) Pin Code- 492001 3 - Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission Through- Its Chairperson North Block- Sector- 19, Nava Raipur (Atal Nagar) Chhattisgarh 492001 ... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Deeksha Pandey, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Akhilesh Mishra, Advocate For Respondents-State : Mr. Yashwant Singh Thakur, Additional Advocate General For Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 11 /03/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to call for records pertaining to the pension case of the petitioner. 2 10.2 That, this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to stay the operation and implementation of proposal dated 16.12.2025 in so far as it reallocates the 20% promotional quota of Counselor (Dying Cadre) to other cadres (Annexure P/1). 10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to direct the respondents to prepare a combined seniority list of all eligible officers of the feeding cadre; 10.4 That, direct the respondents to keep the 20% promotional quota reserved and not to fill the same from any other cadre during pendency of the present writ petition. 10.5 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief, as it may deem fit.” 2. On the objection being raised by counsel for respective respondents with regard to the reliefs’ sought for in the writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition at this stage with liberty to file better constituted petition. 3. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 4. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY