Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44944 (KAR)

SMT. ROOPA v. DHANARAJ L @ DHANU

CRL.P/9492/2024 · 2026-09-30

Rajesh Rai K

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010424262024 NC: 2026:KHC:54462 CRL.P No. 9492 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9492 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SMT. ROOPA W/O MUNIVENKATAIAH AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS AK COLONY, MALEKOTE KANAKAPURA TOWN RAMANGARA KARNATAKA …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GOVINDARAJU S.P, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. DHANARAJ L @ DHANU S/O LATE M.H LINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/AT FORNT OF KABALAMMA TEMPLE, MALEKOTE KANAKAPURA TOWN 2. MANJUNATHA N @ MANJU S/O LATE NARSHIMAIAH AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/AT NEAR GOVT. SCHOOL AK COLONY, MALEKOTE KANAKAPURA TOWN 3. MAHESH CHANDU @ MAHESH LATE CHIKKARASAIAH AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS R/AT AK COLONY, MALEKOTE Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010424262024 NC: 2026:KHC:54462 CRL.P No. 9492 of 2024 KANAKAPURA TOWN 4. SMT. HUCHAMMA W/O LATE M.H LINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS FRONT OF KABALAMMA TEMPLE MALEKOTE, KANAKAPURA TOWN 5. SMT. KRISHNAKUMARI W/O LATE CHIKKANARAYANA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/AT AK COLONY MALEKOTE KANAKAPURA TOWN 6. SRINIVASA M @ SEENA S/O MUTHAIAH AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/AT AK COLONY MALEKOTE KANAKAPURA TOWN …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHESHA P, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 407 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 447 BNNS) PRAYING TO TRANSFER THE CASE IN C.C.NO.291/2024 PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KANAKAPURA TO RANKING COMPETENT COURT OF THE BENGALURU. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL ORDER There is no representation for the petitioner even on the second call. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010424262024 NC: 2026:KHC:54462 CRL.P No. 9492 of 2024 2. Though this matter is posted for eighth time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court. 3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-. SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 9