IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88764 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-211 Year-2025 Thana- KOPA District- Saran ====================================================== Saddam Sai @ Saddam Hussain Son of Babujan Sai Resident of Village- Piyano, P.O.- Anwal, P.S.- Kopa, District- Saran (Chapra), Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. ajendra Nath Ojha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 2 15-01-2026 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Kopa Police Station Case No. 211 of 2025, disclosing offences under Sections 126(2), 74, 75, 78 and 96 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. The prosecution case, as per the First Information Report, the informant alleged that on 10.08.2025 his minor daughter was kidnapped by co-accused Laxman Sah with the help of his friends Saddam Sai (petitioner) and Badshah Sai and she has not been traceable. It is alleged that co-accused Laxman Sah lured his daughter for breakfast and then to a garden, where he and his friends, molested her and performed obscene acts, photos of which are also available as evidence 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88764 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case due to village politics. The petitioner has not committed any offence in the manner alleged and the allegation levelled against the petitioner is false and concocted. Learned counsel further submits that according to the knowledge of petitioner, under Section 180, the statement of the victim girl has been recorded in the Court before learned J.M.F.C, Chapra in which she refused her kidnapping and said that she went to Delhi voluntarily and returned her home with her own sweet will. 5. Considering the nature of allegation and the impugned order, the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Second, Saran, Chhapra, has come to the conclusion that the victim girl has supported the allegation in her statement recorded under Sections 180 and 183, I do not find any reason to differ with the finding of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Second, Chhapra, accordingly, I am not inclined to grant the petitioner privilege of anticipatory bail. 6. The prayer for anticipatory bail stands rejected. Siwani/- (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) U T