Page No. 1/3 GAHC040002072026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : PIL/3/2026 Tamar Nilling and 2 Ors Son of Late Tagio Nilling, PO and PS Daporijo, Upper Subansiri District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Kapnying Natam Age: Occupation : Son of Shri Rikap Natam PO and PS Daporijo Upper Subansiri District. 3: Kebu Dai Age: Occupation : Son of Late Take Dai PO and PS Daporijo Upper Subansiri District VERSUS The State of AP and 5 Ors represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Civil Secretariat, Itanagar 791111 2:The Chief Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Central Zone A PWD Govt of Arunachal Pradesh. 3:The Superintending Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Daporijo Circle Page No. 2/3 PWD Arunachal Pradesh Daporijo. 4:The Executive Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Daporijo Division PWD Arunachal Pradesh Daporijo. 5:The Deputy Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : Upper Subansiri Circle Arunachal Pradesh. 6:M/s N T Agency Age: 0 Occupation : proprietor Shri Nabam Tadap Son of Nabam Lillung permanent resident of Parang Village PO and PS Sagalee and presently residing at Prem Nagar PO and PS Naharlagun Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 7:The Deputy Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : Upper Subansiri Circle Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Taja Garam, GICHIK KAKU,Byabang Mema Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), Page No. 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 21.04.2026 [Manish Choudhury, J.] Heard Ms. B. Mema, learned counsel for the petitioners; and Ms. K. Wangmo, learned Government Advocate, Arunachal Pradesh for the State respondents. Ms. Mema, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that during the subsequent period, the petitioners have received some more materials which would be of relevance. Ms. Mema has submitted, on instruction, that the petitioners want to withdraw the PIL, with the liberty to file it afresh with more particulars. Ms. Wangmo, learned State Counsel has no objection to the prayer for withdrawal. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the instant PIL is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as sought for. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant