Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 449 (GAU)

JORAM PUNA AND 2 ORS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./102/2026 · 2026-02-16

Rajesh Mazumdar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010005642026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./102/2026 JORAM PUNA AND 2 ORS S/O- LATE JIRAM NITIN, R/O- JARA, P.O. AND PS.- ZIRO, DIST. -LOWER SUBANSIRI, ARUNACHAL PRADESH. 2: SRI TAW NYOKUM. S/O- TAW PEPI. R/O- POLO COLONY. NAHARLAGUN P.S.- NAHARLAGUN DIST.- PAPUMPARE ARUNACHAL PRADESH. 3: SRI RAKESH DAS S/O- LATE NAGEN DAS. R/O- GOPINAGAR P.S.- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY PP, ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B CHOWDHURY, MR D L NATH Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER Date : 17.02.2026 Heard Mr. B. Chowdhury, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K Baishya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor who has submitted on instructions that charge sheet has been submitted but the quantity involved in the matter is a intermittent quantity. In such circumstances, the petitioner remains entitled to default bail to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. The petitioner is allowed to approach the learned trial Court to pray for default bail and the learned trial shall impose such condition as may be deemed fit. It is deemed proper to direct that at least one of the bailers for the petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 shall be Government Servant. Bail petition disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant