Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4488 (JHR)

DURBIN SOREN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./505/2026 · 2026-02-25

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:5561 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 505 of 2026 --------- Durbin Soren, aged about 38 years, S/o Jetha Soren, R/o Village-Paklo Santhali Tola, P.O.-Amrapara, P.S.-Amrapara, District-Pakur, (Jharkhand). ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajeeva Sharma, Sr.Advocate Mr. Om Prakash, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Santosh Kumar Shukla, A.P.P. --------- 02/Dated:-25.02.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 103(2), 351(2), 352 r/w 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the charge has been framed under Sections 103(1), 351(2), 352 r/w 3(5) of B.N.S. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he has committed no offence as alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedents and the other co- accused persons have been granted bail on 10.11.2025 in B.A. No.9753 of 2025 and the petitioner for no offence has been languishing in custody since 22.05.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegations made against this petitioner coupled with the fact that the co-accused persons have already been granted bail and that the petitioner is in custody since 22.05.2025; therefore, I am inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Pakur in connection with Amrapara P.S. Case No. 37/2025 corresponding to S.T. Case No.104 of 2025. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co- operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) FEBRUARY 25, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 27.02.2026