Pankaj Sahni @ Pankaj Kumar @ Pankaj Sahani v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./90907/2025 · 2026-02-10
Prabhat Kumar Singh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 44873 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 44873 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90907 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-220 Year-2024 Thana- HATHAURI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Pankaj Sahni @ Pankaj Kumar @ Pankaj Sahani S/O Anandi Sahani @ Anadin Sahni R/O Vill.- Bara Bharti, P.S- Minapur, District - Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 10-02-2026 Heard Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. This is second anticipatory bail application on behalf of the petitioner. Earlier, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail of the petitioner was rejected on merit vide
order dated 07.11.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 65976 of 2025.
3. This application does not reveal any new facts and circumstances for reconsideration of prayer for grant of anticipatory bail of the petitioner. In view of the recent
judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of G.R. Ananda Babu Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr. reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 176, this second anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner is not maintainable.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90907 of 2025(2) dt.10-02-2026 2/2
4. This application is, accordingly, dismissed.
shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T