M/s.AACIYAN PRINT (33BXSPS6037D1Z7) v. THE STATE TAX OFFICER (FAC)
WP/23890/2026 · 2026-07-03
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 44843 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 44843 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 23890 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 23890 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.25938 of 2026 M/s.AACIYAN PRINT (33BXSPS6037D1Z7) Rep by its Proprietor S.Sivanraj, 294/2, Kalliyammal Colony, Thudiyalur, Coimbatore- 641 034. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Tax Officer (fac) Thudiyalur Assessment Circle, CT Building Annex, 1st Floor, Dr.Balasundaram Road, Coimbatore- 641 018. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the impugned order on the file of Respondent vide GSTIN 33BXSPS6037D1Z7/2021-22 dated 26.11.2025 and quash the same which was uploaded in Additional Notices and Orders in the GST Portal. For Petitioner(s): Mr.J Madhusuthanan For Respondent(s): Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, Government Counsel (Tax) ************ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 23890 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER An order dated 26.11.2025 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 3. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that such order was issued without hearing the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed after the period of limitation expired. 4. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to remit 25% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect has been made on the bundle. 5. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 23890 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4
6. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected writ miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 03-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA To The State Tax Officer (fac) Thudiyalur Assessment Circle, CT Building Annex, 1st Floor, Dr.Balasundaram Road, Coimbatore- 641 018.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 23890 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA WP No. 23890 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.25938 of 2026 03-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis