Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44843 (KAR)

SRI BYREGOWDA v. SMT RUKMINIYAMMA

RPFC/9/2022 · 2026-10-06

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010011512022 NC: 2026:KHC:55669 RPFC No. 09 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 09 OF 2022 BETWEEN: SRI BYREGOWDA S/O LATE RAMAKRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/A BEECHANGONDAHALLI VILLAGE VEMGAL HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK-563 101 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. P.B.RAJU, ADVOCATE AND SRI.A.V.SOMASHEKARA, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT.RUKMINIYAMMA W/O LATE RAMAKRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/AT BEECHANGONDAHALLI VILLAGE VEMGAL HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK-563 101 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.RAJESH GOWDA, ADVOCATE) THIS RPFC FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 22.09.2021 PASSED IN CRL.MISC.No. 28/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, KOLAR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 125 OF Cr.P.C. FOR MAINTENANCE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010011512022 NC: 2026:KHC:55669 RPFC No. 09 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER It is submitted that the respondent is no more. In that view of the matter, nothing survives for consideration in this petition. 2. Accordingly, the RPFC is dismissed as infructuous. 3. Pending IAs., if any, shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE PKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21