84 28.09.2026 Ct. No.17 J.Das FAT 266 of 1993 Sankari Saha & Ors. Vs. Ninmal Chandra Sirkar 1. None appears on behalf of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for even in the second call. 2. This matter was appearing in the Warning List and the parties are deemed to have had sufficient notice that the same would be taken up for hearing. 3. In view of the non-appearance of the parties, FAT 266 of 1993 stands dismissed for default. 4. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated. [Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.] [Atarup Banerjee, J.]