Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44825 (CAL)

JAYANTA MITRA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/24927/2026 · 2026-09-28

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

27. 27. 28.09.2026 (D/L) (D/L) CT. NO. 05 CT. NO. 05 (ARPAN-A.R.CT.) In The High Court at Calcutta CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) W.P.A. 24927 OF 2026 JAYANTA MITRA VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS …………… Mr. Abdul Hadi, Adv. … For Petitioner Mr. Pijush Biswas, Adv. (Via VC) Ms. Prisanka Ganguly, Adv. …For State Ms. Shehnaz Tareq Mina, Adv. Mr. Pratick Sardar, Adv. …For Private Respondents 1. Affidavit-of-service filed on behalf of petitioner is taken on record. 2. Petitioner has prayed for direction upon concerned police authority for providing assistance and protection which would permit petitioner to lead normal life. 3. State respondents and respondent nos.5 to 7 are represented by learned advocates. 4. Learned advocate representing State respondents has filed a communication dated 15th September, 2026 of Officer-in-Charge, Rabindra Sarobar Police Station, Kolkata and same is taken on record. Copies of the said communication be made over to learned advocates representing petitioner and private respondents. 5. It is disclosed in the said communication that a matrimonial suit is pending between petitioner and respondent no.5 being the husband and wife and respondent nos.6 & 7 are their daughter and son respectively. Complaint was lodged through learned advocate of petitioner dated 10th August, 2026 alleging disturbance by private respondents. [2] 6. There is marital acrimony and petitioner is complaining of disturbance made by private respondents which appears to be family feud as same is corroborated by the communication dated 15th September, 2026 wherefrom it appears that on enquiry police authority found considering alleged incident registration of case is not warranted. 7. Writ petition stands disposed of. 8. However, concerned police authorities are directed to maintain peace and tranquility at the premises of the petitioner. 9. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. (SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.)