Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44776 (CAL)

SUJOY RAY @ ROHAN MONDAL v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/1931/2026 · 2026-09-28

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

28.09.2026 Sl. No. 43 Court No.35 Rohan (Allowed) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M.(M) 1931 of 2026 In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Basirhat Police Station Case No. 382 of 2024 dated 22.06.2024 for the offences punishable under Section 14A(b) of the Foreigners Act, 1946. -And- In the matter of: Sujoy Ray @ Rohan Mondal …Petitioner Mr. Manabendranath Bandyopadhyay Mr. Shaheb Sadhukhan …for the Petitioner Mr. Shourjyo Mukherjee Mr. Malay Dhar …for the State 1. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for 2 years 3 months and only two (02) witness have been examined out of the five (05) witnesses in the charge-sheet. 2. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail. 3. Having considered the period of detention of the petitioner, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail 4. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner, namely, Sujoy Ray @ Rohan Mondal is allowed. 2 5. Accordingly, the petitioner shall furnish bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Basirhat, North 24 Parganas. 6. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present before the learned Trial Court on each and every date. Petitioner shall not leave the district of North 24 Parganas without prior permission of the learned Trial Court. Additionally, the petitioner would meet with the Officer-in-Charge of the Basirhat Police Station till the evidence of the three witnesses are over. 7. In the event, the petitioner fails to comply with any of the conditions as stated above, the learned Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail in accordance with law without further reference to this Court. 8. Accordingly, CRM (M) 1931 of 2026 is disposed of. 9. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. 10. All parties shall act in terms of the server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. 11. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)