2026:HHC:13613 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.6158 of 2026 Decided on: 27.04.2026 Reenu Kumari … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioner: M/s Raj Kumar and Aman Hansretta, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of respondents. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that there is a typographical error in the memo of parties, as the name of the petitioner is ‘Reenu Kumari’ and not ‘Reena Kumari’. He prays for and is allowed to make necessary correction in the writ file as well as as in the copy of the petition. 3. As prayed for, this petition is disposed of with the direction that representation (Annexure P-3) filed by the petitioner be decided by the Competent Authority within a period of eight weeks from today in terms of the contents therein. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge April 2 7 , 2026 (Rishi) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?