Date of reserved for orders : --- Date of pronouncement : 03.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010246662026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] FRIDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 17665/2026 Between: 1. KARRI GOVINDA RAO, S/O. KASI RAO AGED 48 YEARS, OCC FIELD ASSISTANT-FTE (UNDER TERMINATION) RIO. D.NO 2- 56, PALEM VILLAGE, KIRLAMPUDI MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT PROJECT COORDINATOR, FOR THE MAHATMA GANDHI NATIONAL RURAL -EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME KAKINADA DISTRICT, KAKINADA. 3. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR AND JOINT SECRETARY, THE DISTRICTWATER MANAGEMENTAGENCY, KAKINADA DISTRICT, KAKINADA. 4. THE ASSISTANT PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY PRATHIPADU CLUSTER, KAKINADA 2 DISTRICT 5. THE MANDAL PARISHAD, DEVELOPMENTOFFICER, KIRLAMPUDI MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue n appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularity one in the nature of writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, directing the 2nd Respondent to consider the Appeal Dt. 06.09.2025 in pursuance of the Termination Order vide Rc. No. DVC/43/PE/Kirlampudi Mandal/ 17th round/MGNREGS/2024 dated 29.08.2025 passed by 3rd Respondent, as required under provision of 13 (C)5 of Circular No. 666/EGS(P)/2012, dt. 08.01.2013 in the interest of justice by declaring arbitrary action of the Respondents as illegal, unjust and violation of the article 14,16 and 21 of the constitution of India and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 2nd Respondent to consider the Appeal Dt. 06.09.2025 in pursuance of the Termination Order passed by the 3rd Respondent pending disposal of the WP in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMANA ALLU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.17665 of 2026 ORDER: 1. At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and it has become infructuous. In that view, no orders are required to be passed. 2. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed, as infructuous. 3. No order as to costs. 4. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY Date: 03.07.2026 chs Whether the order is: Speaking ✔ Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable ✔ 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY 64 WRIT PETITION No.17665 of 2026 Dated: 03.07.2026 chs