SREE PRAFULLA PAUL v. SREE NIRUPAM DUTTA CHOWDHURY
FAT/1406/1992 · 2026-09-28
Atarup Banerjee, Ravi Krishan Kapur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 44756 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 44756 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
28.09.2026 Ct. No. 17 Sl. No. 62 RANJAN FAT 1406 of 1992
SREE PRAFULLA PAUL VS.
SREE NIRUPAM DUTTA CHOWDHURY
None appears on behalf of either of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for on their behalf even in the third call. This matter was appearing in the Warning List and the appellant had sufficient notice that the same would be taken up for hearing. In view of the non-appearance of the parties, FAT 1406 of 1992 alongwith all pending connected applications, if any, stand dismissed for default. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated.
[RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR, J.]
[ATARUP BANERJEE, J.]