Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44753 (PAT)

Arbind Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./89278/2025 · 2026-01-27

Ashok Kumar Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89278 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-66 Year-2025 Thana- Khesar District- Banka ====================================================== Arbind Yadav Son of Late Chandradhari Yadav Resident of Village- Pathal Kuriya, P.S.- Khesar, Distt.- Banka ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Saurabh Raj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 27-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 103(1), 352, 351(2)(3) and 3(5) of the BNS. 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner along with others being armed with lathi danda arrived at the door of the informant and it is specifically alleged that one Ranjan Kumar has assaulted with bhujali to the father of the informant. There is allegation against others that they have assaulted other family members of the informant. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no allegation against the petitioner of assaulting anybody. Learned counsel has further submitted that the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89278 of 2025(2) dt.27-01-2026 2/2 petitioner is only a member of the mob and no overt act is alleged against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that similarly situated co-accused, namely, Phool Kumari and Vikas Kumar Yadav have been granted bail by the learned Co-ordinate Benches vide Cr. Misc. Nos. 91472 of 2025 and 153 of 2026 respectively. The case of this petitioner stands on similar footing. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 21.10.2025. 5. Learned Additional Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the bail application of the petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Khesar P.S. Case No. 66 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka. durgesh/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T