[2026:RJ-JP:11031] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 2780/2026 Sakshi Gupta W/o Shri Sharad Gupta D/o Shri Madhusudan Gupta, R/o Pratap Nagar, Jhalar Bawdi, Rawatbhata, District Chitorgarh, Rajasthan. At Present Resident Of House No. 1-Th- 15, Vigyan Nagar, Police Station Vigyan Nagar, Kota, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Kota). ----Applicant Versus The State of Rajasthan through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. J.P. Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 16/03/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 0092/2025 registered at Police Station Udyog Nagar (Kota City) District Kota for the offence(s) under Sections 318(4), 316(5) & 60(a) of BNS, 2023; wherein charge sheet is filed under Sections 318(4), 316(5) of BNS, 2023 and under Section 66D of IT (Amendment) Act, 2008. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that the applicant being housewife, aged about 30 years, has a family to look after. It is further submitted that the instant matter is triable by the Magistrate. It is also submitted that the charge- sheet has already been filed in the matter. It is next submitted that there are no criminal antecedents pending qua the applicant. It is further submitted that the applicant is behind bars since 31.05.2025. Relying upon the provisions enshrined under Section 480(6) of BNSS, it is submitted that as the investigation in the [2026:RJ-JP:11031] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2780/2026] instant matter is already concluded, the applicant is ready to abide by any terms and conditions, if so imposed, while granting the benefits of bail. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the instant bail application. It is submitted that the present case pertains to a heinous offence, whereby embezzlement to the tune of approximately 4.5 crores has taken place. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, considering that the applicant being housewife, aged about 30 years, has a family to look after; that the matter is triable by the Magistrate; that the charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter; that the applicant is behind bars since 31.05.2025; that there exist no criminal antecedents qua the applicant, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge her on bail. 5. Accordingly, the second bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Sakshi Gupta W/o Shri Sharad Gupta D/o Shri Madhusudan Gupta shall be enlarged on bail provided she furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for her appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/s-108