Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44746 (KAR)

M/S DARSHAN ENTERPRISES v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/1675/2026 · 2026-10-06

K S Hemalekha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010043072026 NC: 2026:KHC:55500 WP No. 1675 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO.1675 OF 2026 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: M/S. DARSHAN ENTERPRISES REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN, SRI. VEERAPPA PRAKASH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.112, 5TH CROSS, MALLESHWARA NAGARA, ARSIKERE, HASSAN DISTRICT, KARNATAKA – 573103. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ASHOKA T., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU – 560001. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION (DME) ANAND RAO CIRCLE, BENGALURU – 560009. 3. THE DEAN AND DIRECTOR KODAGU INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (KOIMS), MADIKERI, KODAGU DISTRICT – 571201. 4. THE TENDER INVITING AUTHORITY KODAGU INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (KOIMS), MADIKERI, KODAGU DISTRICT – 571201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA FOR R-1 & R-2; SMT. PRAJWALA SATYA PRAKASH, ADVOCATE (V/C) FOR SRI. PREETHAM JUDE CORREA, ADVOCATE FOR R-3 & R-4) Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010043072026 NC: 2026:KHC:55500 WP No. 1675 of 2026 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED TENDER NOTIFICATION NO.DME/2025-26/SE0630 DATED 01.01.2026 ANNEXURE-E AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING – INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner has approached this Court impugning the tender notification dated 01.01.2026. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that impugned tender notification has been withdrawn by respondent No.3 and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 4. Pending interlocutory application stands disposed of. Sd/- _____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA AT List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8