Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:5586 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.527 of 2026 ------ Anil Kumar Mahato aged about 50 years, S/o Late Bharteshwar Prasad, R/o Kalikanagar, P.O. & P.S. Olidih, Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum, Jharkhand.
… … Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … Opposite Party(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohit Prakash, Advocate
Mr. Navneet Anand, Advocate.
Mr. Vishal Srivastava, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Mahto, APP ----- 02/ 25th February, 2026
1.
This bail application has been filed under Sections 483 and 484 of the BNSS, 2023 wherein, prayer has been made for grant of bail as the petitioner is in custody for allegedly committing offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307 and 506 of the I.P.C in connection with Chandil P.S. Case No. 117 of 2022 pending in the Court of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Chandil.
2.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
3.
Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
4.
The petitioner has not appeared to face the trial before the learned trial court and delayed the trial on that ground, thus I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby, rejected.
(ANANDA SEN, J.) 25.02.2026 Amar/-