29.09.2026 Sl. No. - 65 Court No.35 Rohan (Rejected) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M.(A) 3106 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Durgachak Police Station Case No. 230 of 2025 dated 26.11.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 109/115(2)/117(2)/126(2)/3(5)/329(4)/351(2)/74 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. -And- In the matter of: Jakir Mallik …Petitioner Mr. Suman De …for the Petitioner Mr. Krishnendu Bhattacharya, PP Ms. Tanusree Kar …for the State 1. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that there was a scuffle between both the parties and over a previous dispute, petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case. Injuries were sustained by the petitioner and his family members also. 2. State has produced the case diary. 3. I have taken into account the injury report and the materials available as well as the complicity of the present petitioner. 4. Having considered the same, this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner, namely, Jakir Mallik is rejected. 2 6. With the aforesaid observation, C.R.M. (A) 3106 of 2026 is dismissed. 7. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. 8. All parties shall act in terms of the server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. 9. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)