Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44712 (CAL)

SALAUDDIN @ SEKH SALAUDDIN v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

/3060/2026 · 2026-09-29

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

29.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 20. Kausik (Rejected) CRM (A) 3060 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Watgunge Police Station Case No. 36 of 2026 dated 27.02.2026 under section 126(2), 115(2), 109, 3(5) of the BNS, 2023. And In the matter of : Salauddin @ Sekh Salauddin ……Petitioner. Mr. Deepak Prahladka Ms. Reshmi Khatun ……for the Petitioner. Ms. Soma Mishra Chatterjee Ms. Anindita Mukherjee ….for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner and the informant had a scuffle. Pursuant to which both parties informed the police station. Injuries were sustained by the informant. State has produced the case diary, drawn the attention of the Court to the injury report and the statement of the injured. Having considered the injury sustained, I am of the view this is not a fit case for anticipatory bail. 2 Accordingly, CRM (A) 3060 of 2026 is dismissed. Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)