Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44709 (CAL)

BADAL CH. GURIA v. RAM GOPAL NAG

FAT/1156/1992 · 2026-09-28

Atarup Banerjee, Ravi Krishan Kapur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

D/L.55. September 28, 2026. KAUSHIK. FAT 1156 of 1992 CAN 1 of 2012 (Old CAN 11740 of 2012) Badal Ch Guria Vs. Ram Gopal Nag None appears on behalf of either of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for even in the second call. This matter had been appearing in the Warning List and the parties are deemed to have had sufficient notice that the matter would be taken up for hearing today. A Report filed by the Department indicates that despite efforts, the records of this proceeding are not traceable. In view of the above, FAT 1156 of 1992 along with connected interlocutory application stands dismissed for default. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated. The Department is directed to take necessary steps forthwith. (Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.) (Atarup Banerjee, J.)