Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44705 (KAR)

M/S PERK-INN INTERNATIONAL LTD v. STATE BY KUVEMPUNAGARA POLICE

CRL.P/811/2020 · 2026-10-09

H P Sandesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010451602019 NC: 2026:KHC:56639 CRL.P No. 811 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.811 OF 2020 BETWEEN: 1. M/S. PERK-INN INTERNATIONAL LTD., NO.183, VIBHAVA, 1ST BLOCK, KORAMANGALAL, BANGALORE REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SRI. K.KARUNAKARAN, S/O. P.P.KAVERI CHETTY, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT NO. 1795, 8TH MAIN SECTOR, HSR LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560073. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B R RAGHAVENDRA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE BY KUVEMPUNAGARA POLICE REPRESENTED BY SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU-560001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. MOHAMMED AYUB ALI, ADDL. SPP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF ACCEPTING ‘B’ REPORT ACCEPTED BY THE III ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT MYSORE IN CR.NO.76/2007 VIDE ORDER DATED 16.06.2015 AND TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY LEARNED 2ND ADDITIONAL Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010451602019 NC: 2026:KHC:56639 CRL.P No. 811 of 2020 DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT MYSURU DATED 31.10.2018 IN CRL.RP.NO.318/2018 AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT POLICE TO RE-INVESTIGATE THE CASE ON MERITS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER This petition was filed in 2020 and this Court noticed non- impleading of accused by learned counsel for petitioner and granted a week’s time to implead the accused vide order dated 26.07.2024. Inspite of granting sufficient time, for a period of 2 years, no such application is filed to implead the accused as party to the proceedings. Hence, it is very clear that petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter even after lapse of 6 years. Therefore, no grounds to continue the proceedings Accordingly, the criminal is dismissed. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10