Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010752512024 NC: 2026:KHC:55729 RPFC No. 290 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 290 OF 2024 BETWEEN:
KARTHIK V.P S/O V.N.PRABHAKAR AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS PRESENTLY WORKING AT UNIT 1/19 MERITION STREET, GLADESVILLE NSW 2111 AUSTRALIA
ALSO RESIDING AT NO.390, 38TH CROSS, 9TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 009
GPA HOLDER SRI. PRABHAKAR.V.N.
S/O LATE B. NAGESH RAO, AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS, R/AT NO.390, 38TH CROSS, 9TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 009 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRABHAKAR L. SHETTY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
ANJALI KASHYAP EX -WIFE OF KARTHIK PRABHAKAR AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/O NO 187, 14 A CROSS VYALIKAVAL
Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010752512024 NC: 2026:KHC:55729 RPFC No. 290 of 2024
BENGALURU -560 003
2. ANVITRAYEE D/O KARTHIK PRABHAKAR AGED ABOUT 13 YEARS MINOR REP. BY HER NATURAL GURARDIAN AND MOTHER ANJALI KASHYAP
BOTH ARE R/O NO.287 14 A CROSS, VYALIKAVAL BENGALURU -560 003 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. KASHYAP N. NAIK, ADVOCATE FOR R1)
THIS RPFC FILED UNDER SEC.19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 24.08.2022 PASSED IN CRL. MISC NO.669/2019 ON THE FILE OF I ADDITIONAL PRL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU, ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SEC.125 OF Cr.P.C., FOR MAINTENANCE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
ORAL ORDER
Memo is filed by the petitioner to withdraw the RPFC with liberty to proceed with O.S.No.198/2026 for recognition of the
order dated 19.01.2026 passed by the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia.
2. Memo is taken on record.
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010752512024 NC: 2026:KHC:55729 RPFC No. 290 of 2024
3. The petitioner is before this Court questioning the
order passed in Crl.Misc.No.669/2019. If the petitioner wants to avail any remedy before the civil court, no liberty is required; it is for the petitioner to pursue the remedy in accordance with law.
4. In that view of the matter, RPFC is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Pending IAs., if any in this petition shall stand closed.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
TS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 46 *AK