Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44701 (MAD)

SRIKALS GRAPHICS PRIVATE LIMITED v. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER ST

WP/23882/2026 · 2026-07-03

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 23882 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 23882 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.25927 of 2026 Srikals Graphics Private Limited Represented by its Managing Director, Thiru.S.Kalyana Sundaram, S/o.K.Subramaniyam, A-27, SIDCO Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai-032. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Assistant Commissioner ST Guindy Assessment Circle, No.253 and 255, 2nd floor, Integrated commercial Taxes and Registration Department, South Towers, Nandanam, Chennai-035. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the Respondent vide his order in GSTIN No. 33AAKCS3044D1ZP/2021-2022 dated 31.12.2025 and summary of the order in FORM GST DRC-07 issued Ref. No. ZD331225459563C/2021-2022 dated 31.12.2025 and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Chinnasamy V https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23882 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Respondent(s): Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, Government Counsel (Tax) ************* ORDER An order dated 31.12.2025 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 3. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that such order was issued without hearing the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed after the period of limitation expired. 4. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to remit 25% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect has been made on the bundle. 5. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23882 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. 6. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected writ miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 03-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA To The Assistant Commissioner St Guindy Assessment Circle, No.253 and 255, 2nd floor, Integrated commercial Taxes and Registration Department, South Towers, Nandanam, Chennai-035. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23882 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA WP No. 23882 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.25927 of 2026 03-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis