Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44669 (CAL)

PRABIN KHAN ALIAS TUFO KHAN v. KALIPADA MONDAL AND ORS

CO/3334/2026 · 2026-09-25

Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Sl.20 25.09.2026 Court No.6 BP C.O. 3334 of 2026 Prabin Khan alias Tufo Khan -versus- Kalipada Mondal & Ors. Mr. Debrup Bhattacharjee Mr. Seven S. Biswas Mr. Siddharth Singh ..for the petitioner This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the defendant praying for a direction upon the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bongaon, 24 Parganas (North) to dispose of Title Suit No. 112 of 2018 expeditiously. The learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that a date has been fixed for filing of the amended plaint by the opposite party and the suit is at the stage of evidence. In view of the order sought and proposed to be passed, there is no necessity to issue notice upon the opposite parties. However, the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner shall be obliged to forward a copy of this application along with this order upon the opposite parties or upon the learned advocates representing them before the learned Trial Judge. In the light of the submissions made by the learned advocate for the petitioner, C.O. 3334 of 2026 stands disposed of by requesting the learned Civil Judge (Senior 2 Division), Bongaon, 24 Parganas (North) to make an endeavour to dispose of Title Suit No. 112 of 2018 as expeditiously as possible without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties keeping in mind that the suit is pending from the year 2018. There shall be, however, no order as to costs. Urgent certified photocopy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties expeditiously on compliance of usual legal formalities. (Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)