28.09.2026 Ct. No. 17 Sl. No. 67 RANJAN FAT 1934 of 1992 RENUKA MONDAL VS. NIRAPADA MONDAL None appears on behalf of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for even in the second call. This matter was appearing in the Warning List and the appellant had sufficient notice that the same would be taken up for hearing. It appears from the records that the defects pointed out by the Department as far back as in 07 July, 1993 have not been cured. In view of the non-appearance of the parties, FAT 1934 of 1992 alongwith the connected pending applications, if any, stand dismissed for default. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated. [RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR, J.] [ATARUP BANERJEE, J.]