Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 24067 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ WP No. 24067 of 2026 T.Muthuraj ..Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The District Collector, Cuddalore District.
2. The Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation, Cuddalore.
3. R.Poongothai ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue Writ of Mandamus, directing respondents 1 and 2 to consider the representation dated 5.03.2026 and consequently direct respondents 1 and 2 to take necessary action against third respondent and to arrange the Direct Paddy Procurement Center in Government land. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.N.Subramani For Respondent(s): Mr. S.Sidhartha Vishnu, Government Advocate for R1 Mr.C.Selvaraj, Standing Counsel for R2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 24067 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4
ORDER The present writ petition has been filed for a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to consider petitioner’s representation dated 05.03.2026 and consequently direct respondents 1 and 2 to take necessary action against third respondent and to arrange Direct Paddy Procurement Center in Government land.
2. Petitioner alleges irregularities at Alichikudi Direct Paddy Procurement Centre, including operation from private premises. RTI reply dated 17.04.2026 confirmed that centre runs in private premises with no Government order, lease deed, or rental agreement, raising concerns of transparency and violation of procurement circulars that bar unauthorized collections. Petitioner filed representation dated 05.03.2026 to take action against third respondent, and to shift procurement centre to available Government land nearby to protect farmers and ensure fairness. The said representation is still pending.
3. At the outset, it was submitted by learned State Counsel for first respondent and learned Standing Counsel for second respondent that they would consider petitioner’s representation dated 05.03.2026 and pass appropriate orders, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court, which was agreed to by
learned counsel for petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 24067 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4
4. In view thereof, there shall be a direction to respondents 1 and 2, to consider petitioner’s representation dated 05.03.2026 on its own merits and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to petitioner, third respondent and any other interested party, within a period of four weeks from the date of uploading of web copy without waiting for the receipt of certified copy. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any views with regard to the merits of the case.
5. Accordingly, writ petition stands disposed of. There will be no order as to costs. 25-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No MRN To
1. The District Collector, Cuddalore District.
2. The Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation, Cuddalore. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 24067 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. MRN WP No.24067 of 2026 25-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis