MASUD HAQUE ANSARI v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
WPA/23112/2026 · 2026-09-29
Saugata Bhattacharyya
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 44655 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 44655 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
6 2299..0099..22002266 Ct. No. 05
adeb
WPA 23112 of 2026
Masud Hauqe Ansari Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Maidul Islam Kayal
Mr. Anisur Rahaman
Mr. Archisman Singh
…for the petitioner
Ms. Reshmi Ghosh
Ms. Sanjana Basu
…for the State
Mr. Kiron Sk.
Mr. Jamiruddin Sk.
…for the respondent no. 9
1. Affidavit of service filed on behalf of petitioner is taken on record.
2. By presenting this writ petition petitioner has prayed for direction upon the concerned police authorities to provide assistance which would facilitate him to erect fencing around the land in question.
3. State respondents and private respondents are represented by learned advocates.
4. Learned advocate representing State respondents has filed a communication dated 2nd September, 2026 of Inspector-in-Charge, Domkal Police Station, Murshidabad Police District and same is taken on record. Copies of said communication are made over to learned
2 advocates representing petitioner and private respondents.
5. It is disclosed in the communication that issue is civil in nature and Title Suit No. 88 of 1998 is pending before the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division). 1st Court, Berhampore.
6. In view of pendency of aforesaid suit no order need be passed on this writ petition since issue needs to be decided by the Civil Court. If today Court directs police authority to provide assistance to petitioner which would permit the petitioner to raise fencing around the land in question in that event respective rights of parties over the land in question being subject matter in pending suit may be affected and civil proceeding may be impeded.
7. In view of aforesaid consideration present writ petition is not interfered with and same stands dismissed.
8. However, this order shall not preclude the petitioner to approach Civil Court in pursuit of remedy.
9. Parties to act on server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)