Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMP No. 443 of 2026
Victim …. Petitioner Mr. Priya Ranjan Mishra, Advocate, on behalf of Mr. Pramod Kumar Jena, Advocate -versus-
1. State of Odisha
2. Superintendent of Police, Balasore
3. Inspector-in-Charge, Baliapal Police Station, Balasore
….
Opposite Parties Mr. Sarathi Jyoti Mohanty Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM:
THE HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
Order No.
ORDER 27.04.2026
02.
(Through hybrid mode)
1. In view of the nature of the allegation in the FIR and as the name of the victim has not been redacted in the petition or in the FIR, the learned counsel for the Petitioner is permitted to withdraw this CRLMP and file a fresh CRLMP after taking steps to redact the name of the victim from the petition as well as the annexures within a period of two weeks along with a properly constituted date-chart.
2. Registry shall give an explanation as to why the name of the victim has not been redacted from the petition and annexures in this CRLMP. Registry is also directed to remove the name of the victim from the digital record as well as the physical record of this CRLMP.
(Savitri Ratho)
Judge
RKS