SRI. CHANDRAPPA GOWDA v. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
WP/18414/2024 · 2026-10-05
K S Hemalekha
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 44629 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 44629 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010391792024 NC: 2026:KHC:55067 WP No. 18414 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO. 18414 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
SRI. CHANDRAPPA GOWDA S/O POOVANI GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/AT PANGALA HOUSE, DHARMASTALA VILLAGE, BELTHANGADI TALUK, D.K.DIST. - 574 216. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BALAKRISHNA M.R, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
THE LAW SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001.
3.
THE CHAIRMAN DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY, BENGALURU URBAN, GROUND FLOOR, CITY CIVIL COURT COMPLEX, BENGALURU - 560 009.
4.
THE DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY BENGALURU URBAN, GROUND FLOOR,
Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010391792024 NC: 2026:KHC:55067 WP No. 18414 of 2024
CITY CIVIL COURT COMPLEX, BENGALURU - 560 009, REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBERS SECRETARY. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA FOR R1 AND R2;
SRI. ANTHONY IGNATIUS M.J, ADVOCATE FOR R3 AND R4)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIAPRAYING TO DIRECT THE R3 AUTHORITY TO AWARD THE COMPENSATION TO THE PETITIONER AS
DIRECTED BY THE HONBLE L ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, SITTING AT CHILDRENS COURT, BENGALURU (CCH 51) IN SPL. C. NO. 203/2016, DT. 16/06/2023 AS PER ANNEXURE-A.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
ORAL ORDER
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition has become infructuous and files a memo to that effect.
2. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
TMP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32