Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4462 (RAJ)

SUBHASH SON OF JHABBARRAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/5479/2025 · 2026-03-13

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:10785] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5479/2025 Subhash Son Of Jhabbarram, Aged About 41 Years, Resident Of Bagroda, Fatehpur Sadar, Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP 2. Kuldeep Singh Son Of Shri Manohar Singh, Resident Of Bagroda, Fatehpur Sadar, Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mayank Singhal & Mr. Majhar Hussain For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP Mr. Ravindra Singh Shekhawat, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 13/03/2026 1. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.162/2024 registered at Police Station Fatehpur Sadar, District Sikar for the offence punishable under Section 305(a) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (in short, "BNS"), 2023 along with all subsequent proceedings arising out of it. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that cross cases have been registered between the parties. It is submitted that parties have settled their dispute amicably. It is submitted that due to compromise, further proceedings in the aforesaid FIR are fruitless. The written compromise has been annexed with this petition. [2026:RJ-JP:10785] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-5479/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor places on record factual report dated 16.10.2025 received from the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Circle Reengus, District Sikar. According to the said report, parties have entered into compromise. The said report is taken on record. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise. 5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604] and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the above, this criminal misc. petition is allowed and the FIR No.162/2024 registered at Police Station Fatehpur Sadar, District Sikar is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /195