Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44619 (CAL)

RUBI SINGHANIA NEE GUPTA v. PUNIT SINGHANIA

CO/3118/2026 · 2026-09-25

Shampa Dutt Paul

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 25.09.2026 Item No.23 Court No. 30 skg CO 3118 of 2026 Rubi Singhania nee Gupta VS Punit Singhania Mr. Jatinder singh Dhatt, Adv. Mr. Nirupam Dhali, Adv. … for the petitioner Ms. Afreen Begum, Adv. Mr. Dip Dutta, Adv. …for the O.P. 2 1. Affidavit of service filed be kept with the record. 2. The revisional application has been preferred by the wife/petitioner praying for transfer of Matrimonial Suit no. 2401 of 2019 from the Court of the learned 15th Additional District Judge, Alipore, South 24 Parganas to the Court of the learned District Judge, Serampore, Dist.-Hooghly. 3. It is the case of the petitioner/wife that she is presently residing with her autistic child aged about 8 years at Flat No. 101, Rashbihari Enclave, 392, G.T. Road, Mahesh Serampore, Hooghly, PIN712 202. 4. On the other hand the husband/opposite party residing at Flat No. 7A, 25, Mandevilla Garden, P.S.Gariahat, Dist. South 24 Pargnas, Kolkata, PIN- 700019. 5. The petitioner/wife now prays that the Matrimonial Suit 2401 of 2019 pending before the Court of the learned 15th Additional District Judge, Alipore, South 24 Parganas be transferred to the Court of the learned District Judge, Serampore, Dist.-Hooghly. 2 6. Learned Counsel for the opposite party/husband submits that the petitioner has filed several cases in Alipore Court and is attending the same regularly, as such there is no reason as to why the petitioner’s prayer for transfer should be considered. 7. Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that when the said cases for maintenance and under Domestic Violence Act were filed, the petitioner was residing within the jurisdiction of Alipore Court in her matrimonial home. It is subsequently that she was along with her autistic child (specially abled) has been driven out of her matrimonial home and since then she is residing with her child at Serampore, Hooghly. 8. Considering the said fact and the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the parties and in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in N.C.V. Aishwarya vs A.S. Saravana Karthik Sha, in Civil Appeal No(s). 4894 of 2022 (arising out of SLP (C) No(s). 16465 of 2021), the Matrimonial Suit no. 2401 of 2019 be withdrawn from the Court of the learned 15th Additional District Judge, Alipore, South 24 Parganas and be transferred to the Court of learned Additional District Judge, Serampore, Dist.-Hooghly. 9. The learned Additional District Judge, Serampore, Dist.-Hooghly, shall proceed with the suit in accordance with law with due notice upon both the parties. 3 10. Keeping in mind the case of the opposite party herein, the learned Additional District Judge, Serampore, Dist.-Hooghly, shall be at liberty to permit the opposite party to appear virtually, if such prayer is made. 11. CO 3118 of 2026 stands disposed of. 12. Parties to act on the server copy of this order. 13. Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned Courts for immediate compliance. (Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.)