N.22Sl 151/CL 25.09.2026 DL-225 Ct.19 (S.R.) WPA 3888 of 2026 With CAN 1 of 2026 and CAN 2 of 2026 and CAN 3 of 2026 Sagar Munda v. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Ankit Agarwal Mr. Nilay Sengupta Mr. Sujit Banerjee Mr. Pallav Chowdhury … for the petitioner. Mr. Shiv Shankar Banerjee Mr. Swagatam Deb … for the State. In re: CAN 2 of 2026 1. Affidavit of service as filed today on behalf o the writ petitioner is taken on record. 2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 52 days in filing CAN 1 of 2026, which is an application for recalling of the order dated 30th March, 2026. 3. On perusal of the petition under consideration and after hearing the learned advocates for the contending parties, it appears to this Court that the writ petitioner has assigned sufficient reasons for not filing CAN 1 of 2026 within the period of limitation. 4. Accordingly, prayer is allowed. 5. Consequently, the delay in filing CAN 1 of 2026 is condoned. 6. Consequently, CAN 2 of 2026 is disposed of. In re: CAN 1 of 2026 1. This is an application for recalling of the order of dismissal dated 30.03.2026 when the original writ petition was dismissed for default. 2. On perusal of the application under consideration and after hearing the learned advocates for the contending parties, this Court considers that the writ petitioner has assigned adequate reasons for his non-appearance on 30.03.2026 when the original writ petition was taken up for hearing. Accordingly, prayer is allowed. 3. Consequently, CAN 1 of 2026 is disposed of. 4. Consequently, the order of dismissal dated 30.03.2026 is hereby recalled 5. Consequently, WPA 3088 of 2026 is restored to its original file and number. In re: WPA 3088 of 2026 1. By filing the instant writ petition, the writ petitioner has prayed for issuance of appropriate writ/writs against the respondent no.3 authority commanding him to consider his application for transfer of his land to a non-schedule tribe person, a copy of 2 which has been annexed at page nos.16 and 17. 2. Mr. Banerjee, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent State in his usual fairness submits before this Court that the respondent no.3 authority may be directed to consider the application of the writ petitioner, in accordance with law. 3. In view of such, this Court while disposing the instant writ petition directs the respondent no.3 authority to consider the writ petitioner’s application, a copy of which has been annexed at pages 16 and 17 of the instant writ petition, in accordance with law, and after giving due opportunity of hearing to the writ petitioner and/or his authorized representative and/or any other stakeholder, if there be any, shall pass a reasoned order and shall forthwith communicate the same to the writ petitioner. 4. The entire exercise as indicated in the forgoing paragraphs is to be completed by the respondent no.3 positively within sixty working days from the date of communication of the server copy of this order along with a copy of the said application. 5. Liberty is given to the learned advocate-on-record for the petitioner to communicate the server copy of this order to the respondent no.3, who is directed to act on the server copy of this order. 3 6. With the aforementioned observations, WPA 3888 of 2026 is disposed of. 7. With the disposal of the instant writ petition, CAN 3 of 2026 is also disposed of. 8. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. 9. Before parting with, it is made clear that while disposing the instant writ petition, this Court has made no observation with regard to the merit of the application of the writ petitioner, which is pending for adjudication/disposal before the respondent no.3 authority. 10. Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all the necessary formalities. (Partha Sarathi Sen, J.) 4